🔗 Share this article

An activist group has claimed to have harvested a vast number of tracks from the popular streaming service and is getting ready to publish them publicly.

Possible Boost for Artificial Intelligence Training

Industry experts noted the seeming leak could aid AI companies searching for data to develop their technology.

An entity known as Anna’s Archive reported it had scraped 86 million audio tracks from Spotify and 256 million rows of metadata such as performer and record names. The company, which carries more than 100 million tracks, stated that the leak did not represent its full catalog.

“We have located and disabled the nefarious user accounts that were involved in unlawful scraping,” said a company representative.

The Stockholm-based service, which has more than 700 million users worldwide, further explained that an investigation into unauthorised access found a third party collected public metadata and used questionable tactics to circumvent DRM protections.

Archive's Stated Goal and Concerns

Spotify does not believe the music taken by Anna’s Archive has been released yet. Anna’s Archive, which is recognized for providing links to pirated books, wrote in a blog it wanted to create a ‘historical repository’ for music.

The group claimed the music files represented 99.6% of all music streamed to by Spotify users and would be distributed via ‘torrents’, a means of sharing large data files online.

“Of course the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a fantastic beginning,” commented Anna’s Archive, which describes its mission as “safeguarding humanity’s knowledge and heritage”.

Model Development and Intellectual Property Debate

A composer and campaigner for defending artists’ copyright, said the breached music would likely be utilized for training artificial intelligence systems.

“Educating models on pirated material is unfortunately common in the AI industry, so this accessed music is almost certain to end up instructing AI models,” he stated.

The group's website alludes to a large online archive, a vast online repository of copyrighted books that has allegedly been leveraged by the parent company of Facebook to train its AI models.

A founder of an artificial intelligence company wrote on the professional network that members of the public could in principle “build their own personal free equivalent of Spotify”. The executive said it could also enable tech companies to “train on modern music at scale”.

Intellectual property law has emerged as a key issue between creatives, writers and creatives on one side and AI companies on the other.

Policy Considerations and Responses

In the UK, creative professionals have protested against a ministerial proposal to allow AI companies use protected work without consent unless the owner signals. Almost every participant to a government call for evidence on the idea has backed artists’ apprehensions.

The secretary of state for science, innovation and development informed parliament this month there was “no clear consensus” on the issue, adding that ministers would “take the time to get this right”. The government has pledged to make policy proposals on AI and copyright by March 2025.